Tomika Hindson v. Portfolio Recovery Associates
Tomika Hindson v. Portfolio Recovery Associates
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 25-1331 ___________________________
Tomika Hindson
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________
Submitted: July 28, 2025 Filed: July 31, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________
Before ERICKSON, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Tomika Hindson appeals following the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se complaint for lack of standing. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district
1 The Honorable Stephen H. Locher, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. court did not err in dismissing the case. See In re Polaris Mktg., Sales Pracs., & Prods. Liab. Litig., 9 F.4th 793, 796 (8th Cir. 2021) (de novo review of dismissal for lack of standing). We modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. See Cnty. of Mille Lacs v. Benjamin, 361 F.3d 460, 464-65 (8th Cir. 2004) (dismissal on jurisdictional grounds must be without prejudice). We affirm the judgment as modified. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished