United States v. Tracy Bess
United States v. Tracy Bess
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 25-1502 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Tracy Leann Bess
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________
Submitted: August 4, 2025 Filed: August 7, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________
Before ERICKSON, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Tracy Bess appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after she pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit mail theft. Her counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1976), challenging the reasonableness of the sentence.
1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Bess. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (standard of review). Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished