United States v. Tracy Bess

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Tracy Bess

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 25-1502 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Tracy Leann Bess

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________

Submitted: August 4, 2025 Filed: August 7, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before ERICKSON, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Tracy Bess appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after she pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit mail theft. Her counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1976), challenging the reasonableness of the sentence.

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Bess. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (standard of review). Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished