United States v. Tracy Bess
United States v. Tracy Bess
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 25-1502 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Tracy Leann Bess lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________ Submitted: August 4, 2025 Filed: August 7, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________ Before ERICKSON, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Tracy Bess appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1 after she pleaded guilty to conspiring to commit mail theft. Her counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1976), challenging the reasonableness of the sentence.
The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. After careful review, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Bess. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (standard of review). Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.