Carsten Quinlan v. Daniel Puls

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 25-2155 ___________________________

Carsten J. Quinlan lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Daniel Puls; Cheryl Puls; Alissa Puls lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota

____________ Submitted: November 5, 2025

Filed: November 10, 2025

[Unpublished] ____________

Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.

Carsten Quinlan appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se civil action for failure to state a claim. After careful review of the record, we find no basis for reversal. See Federer v. Gephardt, 363 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.