Daniel Lipsky v. Nate Cronin
Daniel Lipsky v. Nate Cronin
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 25-1692 ___________________________
Daniel Robert Lipsky
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nate Cronin; Bill Wainman; Michael Close; City of Hot Springs, SD
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Western ____________
Submitted: December 9, 2025 Filed: December 12, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________
Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
In this pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Daniel Robert Lipsky appeals after the district court1 granted, in part, the defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint and
1 The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, then United States District Judge for the Western District of South Dakota, took inactive status on July 31, 2025. granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the remaining claims. After careful de novo review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Malone v. Hinman, 847 F.3d 949, 952 (8th Cir. 2017) (standard of review); 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished