United States v. Martrell Burns

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

United States v. Martrell Burns

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 25-1974 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Martrell Devon Burns

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: December 15, 2025 Filed: December 18, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Martrell Burns appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and filed a brief challenging the revocation sentence as substantively unreasonable.

Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Burns, as it properly considered the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review), and the sentence was below the advisory Guidelines range and statutory limit, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Reference

Status
Unpublished