United States v. Martrell Burns
United States v. Martrell Burns
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 25-1974 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Martrell Devon Burns
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: December 15, 2025 Filed: December 18, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Martrell Burns appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and filed a brief challenging the revocation sentence as substantively unreasonable.
Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Burns, as it properly considered the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 917 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review), and the sentence was below the advisory Guidelines range and statutory limit, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm. ______________________________
1 The Honorable Eric C. Tostrud, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished