United States v. Dexter Hall
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-3337 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Dexter D. Hall lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: February 19, 2026 Filed: February 24, 2026 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, SMITH, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.
Dexter Hall appeals after he pled guilty to being a felon in possession of ammunition. He argues the district court1 erred in denying his motion to dismiss the The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. indictment because 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment both facially and as applied to him. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court properly denied the motion, as Hall’s argument is foreclosed by our precedent.
See United States v. Jackson, 110 F.4th 1120, 1125, 1129 (8th Cir. 2024), cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 2708 (2025); see also United States v. Harris-Franklin, 146 F.4th 631, 637 & n.2 (8th Cir. 2025); United States v. Cameron, 99 F.4th 432, 435–36 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 145 S. Ct. 314 (2024). Accordingly, we affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.