United States v. Alondra Rebolledo

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 25-1035 ___________________________

United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Alondra Rebolledo lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________ Submitted: June 3, 2026 Filed: June 8, 2026 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.

Alondra Rebolledo appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after she pleaded guilty to drug and firearm offenses. She challenges a drug-premises enhancement and the denial of her motion for a downward departure or variance.

Upon careful review, we conclude the district court did not clearly err by concluding that Rebolledo maintained a drug premises. See United States v. Clark, 135 F.4th 622, 625 (8th Cir. 2025); United States v. Miller, 698 F.3d 699, 706-07 (8th Cir. 2012). We cannot review the denial of Rebolledo’s request for a downward departure, as the district court acknowledged its authority to depart, and Rebolledo does not claim the court acted with an unconstitutional motive. See United States v. Carter, 960 F.3d 1007, 1012-13 (8th Cir. 2020). We also conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a downward variance. See United States v. Lewis, 593 F.3d 765, 773 (8th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm.