United States v. Andrew Hawkins

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 26-1159 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Andrew Lee Hawkins Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________ Submitted: August 3, 2026 Filed: August 6, 2026 [Unpublished] ____________ Before GRASZ, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.

Andrew Hawkins received a 300-month sentence after he pleaded guilty to producing child pornography. See 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), (e). An Anders brief suggests that the sentence is substantively unreasonable. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

We conclude otherwise. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461– (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (reviewing for an abuse of discretion). The record establishes that the district court 1 sufficiently considered the statutory sentencing factors, see 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and did not rely on an improper factor or commit a clear error of judgment. See United States v. McDaniels, 19 F.4th 1065, 1067 (8th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (explaining that the district court has “latitude to weigh the relevant sentencing factors . . . differently than a defendant would have preferred” (citation omitted)).

We have also independently reviewed the record and conclude that no other non-frivolous issues exist. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83 (1988). We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel permission to withdraw.