U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1902

Piper v. Cashell

Piper v. Cashell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 1, 1902
1 Alaska Fed. 905; 118 F. 1019

Piper v. Cashell

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In the above-entitled cause, counsel for the defendants in error having called the attention of the court to the fact that counsel who signed the brief for the plaintiff in error therein are not members of the bar of the circuit court of appeals, thereupon the court held that briefs which were not signed by counsel whose qualifications were consistent with the requirements of rule 7 of the court (31 C.C.A. cxliv, 90 F. cxliv) would not be considered by the court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.