U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1904

Lee Yue v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 3, 1904 · Gilbert, Morrow, Ross

133 F. 45; 66 C.C.A. 178; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4382

Counsel

Henry C. Dibble & Dibble, for appellant., Duncan McKinlay (Marshall B. Woodworth, U. S. Atty. of counsel), Asst. U. S. Atty.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Chin Ken (District Court, N.D. New York 1910)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

In view of the rule that obtains in cases of this character, we are unable to say that the District Judge erred in affirming the order of the commissioner directing the deportation of the petitioner. See United States v. Wong Dep Ken (D. C.) 57 Fed. 206; United States v. Lung Hong (D. C.) 105 Fed. 188; United States v. Chun Hoy, 111 Fed. 899, 50 C. C. A. 57; United States v. Chu Chee, 93 Fed. 797, 35 C. C. A. 613; United States v. Yong Yew (D. C.) 83 Fed. 832; United States v. Ah Chung (C. C. A.) 130 Fed. 885; Li Sing v. United States, 180 U. S. 486, 21 Sup. Ct. 449, 45 L. Ed. 634. The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.