Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit /

1904

92 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinions from 1904.

  • San Fernando Copper Mining & Reduction Co. v. Humphrey May 3, 1904 No. 955 130 F. 298; 64 C.C.A. 544; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4157
  • American Bonding Co. v. Spokane Building & Loan Soc. May 2, 1904 No. 1,010 130 F. 737; 65 C.C.A. 121; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4212
  • Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Jones May 2, 1904 No. 987 130 F. 813; 65 C.C.A. 363; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4227
  • Eureka County Bank v. Clarke May 2, 1904 No. 1,002 130 F. 325; 64 C.C.A. 571; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4163
  • First Nat. Bank v. State Nat. Bank May 2, 1904 No. 1,008 131 F. 422; 65 C.C.A. 406; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4295
  • First Nat. Bank v. State Nat. Bank May 2, 1904 No. 1,016 131 F. 430; 65 C.C.A. 414; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4296
  • Frye & Bruhn v. Carstens May 2, 1904 No. 1,026 130 F. 766; 65 C.C.A. 192; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4219
  • Hopkins v. Fachant May 2, 1904 No. 1,003 130 F. 839; 65 C.C.A. 1; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4231
  • In re Pacific Mail S. S. Co. May 2, 1904 No. 1,035 130 F. 76; 69 L.R.A. 71; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4131
  • McKnight v. United States May 2, 1904 No. 1,036 130 F. 659; 65 C.C.A. 37; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4198
  • Russell v. Hayner May 2, 1904 No. 1,015 2 Alaska Fed. 271; 130 F. 90; 64 C.C.A. 424; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4133
  • United States v. Ah Chung May 2, 1904 No. 1,022 130 F. 885; 65 C.C.A. 562; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4245
  • United States v. Page May 2, 1904 134 F. 1022; 67 C.C.A. 681; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4552
  • Childress v. Fraternal Union of America Apr 15, 1904 12-70430 113 Tenn. 252
  • Del Toro v. Arambarry Apr 4, 1904 19-15072 6 P.R. 127
  • Tsoi Yii v. United States Apr 4, 1904 129 F. 585; 64 C.C.A. 153; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4076
  • Heckman v. Sutter Mar 7, 1904 No. 792 2 Alaska Fed. 264; 128 F. 393; 63 C.C.A. 135; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3919
  • Kenney v. Louie Mar 7, 1904 No. 939 128 F. 856; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3971; 63 C.C.A. 584
  • The Matterhorn Mar 7, 1904 No. 968 128 F. 863; 63 C.C.A. 331; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3972
  • Black Hills & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Tacoma Mill Co. Mar 4, 1904 No. 988 129 F. 312; 63 C.C.A. 544; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4046
  • Heinze v. Butte & B. Consol. Min. Co. Mar 4, 1904 No. 1,033 129 F. 274; 63 C.C.A. 388; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4042
  • Alaska Fish & Lumber Co. v. Chase Mar 1, 1904 No. 983 2 Alaska Fed. 258; 128 F. 886; 64 C.C.A. 1; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3978
  • Letson v. Alaska Packers' Ass'n Mar 1, 1904 No. 944 130 F. 129; 64 C.C.A. 463; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4147
  • Lewis v. Clark Mar 1, 1904 No. 838 129 F. 570; 64 C.C.A. 138; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4072
  • Weisshaar v. Kimball S. S. Co. Mar 1, 1904 No. 991 128 F. 397; 65 L.R.A. 84; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3920
  • Socrates Quicksilver Mines v. Carr Realty Co. Feb 23, 1904 No. 990 130 F. 293; 64 C.C.A. 539; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4156
  • Heidelbach, Friedlander & Co. v. Carter Feb 20, 1904 16-80101 79 S.W. 346; 34 Tex. Civ. App. 579; 1904 Tex. App. LEXIS 620
  • Heinze v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Min. Co. Feb 16, 1904 Nos. 958, 966 129 F. 337; 64 C.C.A. 15; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4051
  • Smith v. Day Feb 15, 1904 No. 959 128 F. 561; 63 C.C.A. 189; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3937
  • Chilberg v. Lyng Feb 8, 1904 No. 976 2 Alaska Fed. 252; 128 F. 899; 63 C.C.A. 451; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3981
  • Munich Assur. Co. v. Dodwell & Co. Feb 8, 1904 No. 975 128 F. 410; 63 C.C.A. 152; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3923
  • Paauhau Sugar Plantation Co. v. Palapala Feb 8, 1904 No. 981 127 F. 920; 62 C.C.A. 552; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3845
  • Alaska Commercial Co. v. Williams Feb 2, 1904 No. 963 2 Alaska Fed. 240; 128 F. 362; 63 C.C.A. 92; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3913
  • Alaska S. S. Co. v. Collins Feb 1, 1904 No. 982 2 Alaska Fed. 226; 127 F. 937; 62 C.C.A. 569; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3848
  • Moffitt v. United States Feb 1, 1904 No. 951 128 F. 375; 63 C.C.A. 117; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3915
  • Noah v. United States Feb 1, 1904 No. 962 128 F. 270; 62 C.C.A. 618; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3901
  • Northwest Fixture Co. v. Kilbourne & Clark Co. Feb 1, 1904 No. 980 128 F. 256; 62 C.C.A. 638; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3897
  • Shoup v. Marks Feb 1, 1904 No. 971 2 Alaska Fed. 231; 128 F. 32; 62 C.C.A. 540; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3890
  • Terry v. Bird Feb 1, 1904 No. 960 129 F. 592; 64 C.C.A. 160; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4079
  • Union Transp. Co. v. Kent Feb 1, 1904 Nos. 952, 953 129 F. 715; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4089
  • United States v. Losekamp Feb 1, 1904 No. 967 127 F. 959; 62 C.C.A. 591; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3855
  • In re Heinze Jan 6, 1904 No. 1,033 127 F. 96; 62 C.C.A. 96; 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 3787
« Prev 1 2 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑