Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit /

1909

106 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinions from 1909.

  • Chilberg v. Smith Dec 6, 1909 No. 1,748 174 F. 805; 98 C.C.A. 513; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5259
  • Thorndyke v. Gunnison Nov 22, 1909 No. 1,697 3 Alaska Fed. 426; 174 F. 137; 98 C.C.A. 171; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5162
  • Western Engineering & Construction Co. v. Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works Nov 12, 1909 No. 1,696 174 F. 224; 98 C.C.A. 132; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5177
  • United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co. v. Chaddock & Co. Nov 3, 1909 No. 1,736 173 F. 577; 97 C.C.A. 527; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5090
  • Johnson v. Willapa Lumber Co. Oct 18, 1909 No. 1,685 173 F. 488; 97 C.C.A. 494; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5087
  • Lilienthal v. Cartwright Oct 18, 1909 No. 1,664 173 F. 580; 97 C.C.A. 530; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5091
  • City of Helena v. Helena Waterworks Co. Oct 4, 1909 No. 1,703 173 F. 18; 97 C.C.A. 320; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5053
  • Griffin Wheel Co. v. Smith Oct 4, 1909 No. 1,689 173 F. 245; 97 C.C.A. 411; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5063
  • Los Alamitos Sugar Co. v. Carroll Oct 4, 1909 No. 1,701 173 F. 280; 97 C.C.A. 446; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5070
  • National Cash Register Co. v. Salling Oct 4, 1909 No. 1,652 173 F. 22; 97 C.C.A. 334; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5054
  • Pacific Coast Ry. Co. v. United States Oct 4, 1909 No. 1,658 173 F. 448; 98 C.C.A. 31; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5082
  • Riverside Trust Co. v. East Riverside Water Co. Oct 4, 1909 No. 1,707 173 F. 241; 97 C.C.A. 407; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5062
  • Winfree v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. Oct 4, 1909 No. 1,663 173 F. 65; 44 L.R.A.N.S. 841; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5058
  • Cobb v. United States Sep 13, 1909 No. 1,702 3 Alaska Fed. 419; 172 F. 641; 96 C.C.A. 477; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5020
  • United States v. Foo Duck Sep 13, 1909 No. 1,681 172 F. 856; 97 C.C.A. 204; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5033
  • Eastern Oregon Land Co. v. Brosnan Sep 7, 1909 Nos. 1,694, 1,695 173 F. 67; 97 C.C.A. 382; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5059
  • Freeding v. Allen Sep 7, 1909 No. 1,667 3 Alaska Fed. 409; 173 F. 263; 97 C.C.A. 429; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5067
  • Miner v. Rickey Sep 7, 1909 No. 1,583 172 F. 1023; 96 C.C.A. 666; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5050
  • Pacific Mail S. S. Co. v. Commercial Pacific Cable Co. Sep 7, 1909 No. 1,687 173 F. 28; 97 C.C.A. 346; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5055
  • Saveljich v. Lytle Logging & Mercantile Co. Sep 7, 1909 No. 1,676 173 F. 277; 97 C.C.A. 443; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5069
  • Tremont Coal & Coke Co. v. Johnson Sep 7, 1909 No. 1,656 172 F. 785; 97 C.C.A. 207; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5025
  • Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Pomona Aug 7, 1909 No. 1,678 172 F. 829; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5029
  • Stevens & Baldwin v. Sayers Aug 4, 1909 16-80101 82 Vt. 324; 73 A. 817; 1909 Vt. LEXIS 295
  • California Development Co. v. New Liverpool Salt Co. Aug 2, 1909 No. 1,584 172 F. 792; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5026
  • Cunningham v. Rodgers Aug 2, 1909 No. 1,603 171 F. 835; 96 C.C.A. 507; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4865
  • El Cambio Gold Mining Co. v. Cucharas Mining Co. Aug 2, 1909 No. 1,669 172 F. 366; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4916
  • Holt Mfg. Co. v. Best Mfg. Co. Aug 2, 1909 No. 1,608 172 F. 409; 97 C.C.A. 107; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4921
  • New Liverpool Salt Co. v. California Development Co. Aug 2, 1909 Nos. 1,649, 1,659 172 F. 820; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5027
  • The Thrasher Aug 2, 1909 No. 1,704 173 F. 258; 97 C.C.A. 424; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5066
  • Eadie v. Chambers Jul 6, 1909 No. 1,595 3 Alaska Fed. 396; 172 F. 73; 96 C.C.A. 561; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4883
  • Southern Pac. Co. v. United States Jul 6, 1909 No. 1,672 171 F. 360; 96 C.C.A. 252; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4821
  • Southern Pac. Co. v. United States Jul 6, 1909 No. 1,671 171 F. 364; 96 C.C.A. 256; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4822
  • Gillilland v. Brantner Jul 1, 1909 16-80101 145 Iowa 275; 121 N.W. 1047
  • State v. Minnick Jun 8, 1909 12-70430 54 Or. 86; 102 P. 605; 1909 Ore. LEXIS 19
  • McNeil v. McNeil May 31, 1909 No. 1,433 170 F. 289; 95 C.C.A. 485; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4699
  • Miller v. Margerie May 28, 1909 No. 1,692 3 Alaska Fed. 389; 170 F. 710; 96 C.C.A. 30; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4747
  • Cardwell v. United States May 24, 1909 No. 1,597 169 F. 592; 95 C.C.A. 90; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4613
  • Ginsburg v. Mears May 24, 1909 No. 1,693 170 F. 427; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4721
  • Stenfjeld v. Espe May 24, 1909 No. 1,631 3 Alaska Fed. 384; 171 F. 825; 96 C.C.A. 497; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4862
  • Storm v. Territory of Arizona May 17, 1909 No. 1,690 170 F. 423; 95 C.C.A. 593; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4720
  • Richmond Coal Co. v. Commercial Union Assur. Co., Ltd., of London, England May 10, 1909 No. 1,622 169 F. 746; 95 C.C.A. 178; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4629
  • Robnett v. United States May 10, 1909 No. 1,607 169 F. 778; 95 C.C.A. 244; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4635
  • Shackleton v. Baggaley May 10, 1909 No. 1,674 170 F. 57; 95 C.C.A. 505; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4665
  • Wong Chun v. United States May 10, 1909 No. 1,646 170 F. 182; 95 C.C.A. 198; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4687
  • Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. United States May 5, 1909 No. 1,590 170 F. 250; 95 C.C.A. 446; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4692
  • Alliance Assur. Co., Ltd., of London, Eng. v. Pacific Union Club May 3, 1909 No. 1,620 169 F. 778; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4634
  • Bircher v. United States May 3, 1909 No. 1,593 169 F. 589; 95 C.C.A. 87; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4612
  • Chin Man Can v. United States May 3, 1909 No. 1,645 170 F. 187; 95 C.C.A. 370; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4689
  • Commercial Union Assur. Co. v. Pacific Union Club May 3, 1909 No. 1,618 169 F. 776; 95 C.C.A. 242; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4632
  • Dwyer v. United States May 3, 1909 No. 1,606 170 F. 160; 95 C.C.A. 416; 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4681
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑