U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1914

Perries Irr. Dist. v. Escher

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 4, 1914

215 F. 566; 132 C.C.A. 78; 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 1267

Counsel

C. Hughes Jordan, Frank W. Stafford, and Kenyon F. Lee, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff in error., William M. Hiatt and Osear C. Mueller, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant in error.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The question in this case is the same as that in Perris Irrigation District, a Corporation, v. R. B. Turnbull, Administrator of the Estate of R. H. Thompson, Deceased (No. 2356) 215 Fed. 562, 132 C. C. A. 74, and, for the reasons there stated, the judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.