U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1916

Marshall v. Backus

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 7, 1916

229 F. 1021; 143 C.C.A. 662; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1621

Counsel

Henry F. Marshall, and Albert Michelson, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., John W. Preston, U. S. Atty., and Walter E. Hettman, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Gal., for appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

On the authority of Healy v. Backus, 221 Fed. 358, 137 C. C. A. 166, and Choy Gum v. Backus, 228 Fed. 487, 139 C. C. A. 35, the judgment (213 Fed. 123) is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.