U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1916

Chan Pong v. United States

Chan Pong v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 16, 1916
230 F. 1021; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1521

Chan Pong v. United States

Opinion of the Court

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the First Division of the Northern District of California. George .T. Hatfield, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error. John W. Preston, U. S. Atty., and Caspar A. Ornbaum, Asst/U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal. Dismissed for noncompliance by plaintiff in error with rules 28 and 24 (150 Fed. xxxii, xxxiii, 79 O. C. A. xxxii, xxxiii) — failure of plaintiff in error to print record under rule 23, and to file a printed brief, under rule 24.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.