U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1916

Osterman v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.

Osterman v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 28, 1916
230 F. 1023; 144 C.C.A. 664

Osterman v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.

Opinion of the Court

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Montana. L. O. Evans, of Kulte, Mont., W. B. Rodgers, of Anaconda, Mont., and D. Gay Stivers, of Butte, Mont., for defendant in error. On motion of counsel for defendant in error, writ of error dismissed for the noneompliance by the plaintiff in error with the pro visions.of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the rules of practice of this court (150 Fed. xxix, 79 C. C. A. xxix); the plaintiff in error having foiled to file a record thereof and to docket the case by or before the return day required by said rule.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.