U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1916

Pitt v. Rodgers

Pitt v. Rodgers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 24, 1916
234 F. 1023; 148 C.C.A. 665; 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2156

Pitt v. Rodgers

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Nevada. Morrison, Dunno & Brobeck and Edward Hohfeld, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Upon application of counsel for appellee, and on consideration ol' certificate of clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, ordered, appeal dismissed for noncompliance by the appellants with provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice (150 Fed. cxxvii).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.