The facts in this case are substantially the same as in ease No. 2852, just decided (244 Fed. 83, - C, C. A. -), the differences consisting mainly in the amounts involved and the name of the bank upon which the cheeks were drawn for the amounts deposited with the clerk of the court. These differences are immaterial in determining the questions presented to this court.

For the reasons stated in case No. 2852, the judgment is affirmed.