U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1919

Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Blum

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 7, 1919 · Gilbert, Hunt, Ross

258 F. 901; 169 C.C.A. 621; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1284

Counsel

Hartman & Hartman, of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff in error., Preston, Thorgrimson & Turner and Lyons & Orton, all of Seattle, Wash., for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Christensen v. New England Mutual LiFe Insurance (Ga. 1944)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

This cause was tried jointly with United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Blum, 258 Fed. 897, and by stipulation the facts of that case are to be considered herein. Inasmuch as the questions of law are also the same as in the other ease, upon the authority of the decision therein, the judgment is reversed, with directions to grant a new trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.