Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit /

1920

127 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinions from 1920.

  • Boland v. Ballaine 266 F. 22, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Port Wells Mill & Lumber Co. v. Crawford 264 F. 935, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Fiunkin v. United States 265 F. 1, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • McGinn v. Oregon-Washington R. & Nav. Co. 265 F. 81, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Bodkin v. Edwards 265 F. 621, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Twenty-One Mining Co. v. Original Sixteen to One Mine 265 F. 469, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Twenty-One Mining Co. v. Original Sixteen to One Mine 265 F. 547, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Hockett v. United States 265 F. 588, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • White v. Fong Gin Gee 265 F. 600, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Overseas Shipping Co. v. Struthers & Dixon 265 F. 612, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Wilson v. Union Tool Co. 265 F. 669, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Star Mining Co. v. Federal Mining & Smelting Co. 265 F. 881, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • New York Canal Co. v. Bond 265 F. 228, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Jones v. United States 265 F. 235, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Reed v. Harkrader 264 F. 834, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Alaska Mines Corp. v. Greenberg 264 F. 929, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Schurmann v. United States 264 F. 917, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Kar-Ru Chemical Co. v. United States 264 F. 921, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Pacific Mail S. S. Co. v. Lucas 264 F. 938, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Nudelman v. United States 264 F. 942, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Sykes v. United States 264 F. 945, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Hathaway v. Ford Motor Co. 264 F. 952, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • United States v. Dominion Oil Co. 264 F. 955, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Lee Wing Wah v. White 264 F. 961, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • W. F. Schultheiss Co. v. Phillips 264 F. 971, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Fain v. United States 265 F. 473, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Bold v. United States 265 F. 581, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Marconi Wireless Telegraph Co. of America v. Kilbourne & Clark Mfg. Co. 265 F. 644, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co. v. United States 266 F. 145, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Neis v. Ebbe 189 P. 417, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Ihihi v. Kahaulelio 263 F. 817, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Sol Louie v. United States 264 F. 295, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Monidah Trust v. Arctic Const. Co. 264 F. 303, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Lee U. Ong v. United States 264 F. 315, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Kaphan v. United States 264 F. 323, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Sonnenberg v. United States 264 F. 327, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Martin v. United States 264 F. 329, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • United States v. North American Oil Consolidated 264 F. 336, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • United States v. Kern River Co. 264 F. 412, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • W. R. Grace & Co. v. Frank Waterhouse & Co. 264 F. 422, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Hines v. Johnson 264 F. 465, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Knudsen v. Domestic Utilities Mfg. Co. 264 F. 470, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Logan v. Baxter 264 F. 514, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Ching v. United States 264 F. 639, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Franklin v. Nevada-California Power Co. 264 F. 643, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Richards v. United States 264 F. 654, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Gooch v. Oregon Short Line R. 264 F. 664, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Washington-Alaska Bank v. Dexter Horton Nat. Bank 263 F. 304, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Stafford v. Albers Bros. Milling Co. 263 F. 86, (9th Cir. 1920)
  • Tongue & Yellowstone River Irr. Dist. v. Jordan 263 F. 261, (9th Cir. 1920)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑