Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit /

1922

126 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinions from 1922.

  • W. R. Grace & Co. v. Ford Motor Co. of Canada 278 F. 955, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Helm v. American Hawaiian S. S. Co. 279 F. 72, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • United States v. Miles 279 F. 267, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Hoof v. Pacific American Fisheries 279 F. 367, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Heath Unit Tile Co. v. American Fire Brick Co. 279 F. 743, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Hovley v. United States 277 F. 788, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Marlow v. Paganini 277 F. 790, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Page v. United States 278 F. 41, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Nelson v. Casey 279 F. 100, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Gnerich v. Yellowley 277 F. 632, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Pacific States Electric Co. v. Wright 277 F. 756, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Sichofsky v. United States 277 F. 762, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Chang Sim v. White 277 F. 765, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • People's Development Co. v. Southern Pac. Co. 277 F. 794, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Nesmith v. Ankeny 277 F. 805, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Forrest v. United States 277 F. 873, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Greco Canning Co. v. P. Pastene & Co. 277 F. 877, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Curtis v. North American Indian, Inc. 277 F. 909, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Hosaye Sakaguchi v. White 277 F. 913, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • King County v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1. 278 F. 46, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • American Film Co. v. Reilly 278 F. 147, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Shasta County v. Mountain Copper Co. 278 F. 155, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Violette v. United States 278 F. 163, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Samlin v. United States 278 F. 170, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Cabrillos v. Angel 278 F. 174, (9th Cir. 1922)
  • Rossi v. United States 278 F. 349, (9th Cir. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑