Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit /

1923

156 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinions from 1923.

  • George Wills & Sons, Ltd. v. Larzelere 288 F. 559, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Warren v. Bromley 288 F. 563, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • First Nat. Bank v. Pray 288 F. 675, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • United States v. Title Ins. & Trust Co. 288 F. 821, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Reid v. Baker 288 F. 969, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Haskell v. McClintic-Marshall Co. 289 F. 405, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Rogulj v. Alaska Gastineau Mining Co. 288 F. 549, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Law v. Smith 288 F. 7, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • United States v. Woerndle 288 F. 47, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • United States v. Gularas 288 F. 54, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Shell Co. v. Pacific S. S. Co. 288 F. 362, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Lockwood v. City of Portland 288 F. 480, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Nampa & Meridian Irr. Dist. v. Bond 288 F. 541, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Australia v. MacDonald 288 F. 546, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Kockos v. C. Itoh & Co. 288 F. 557, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Austin 288 F. 1, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Clifford v. Miller 288 F. 537, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Landsberg v. San Francisco & P. S. S. Co. 288 F. 560, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Chung Fook v. White 287 F. 533, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Barnett v. Sproal 287 F. 706, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. 287 F. 780, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Moore v. Risley 287 F. 10, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Bank of Italy v. F. Romeo & Co. 287 F. 5, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Willamette Nav. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. 287 F. 464, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Aktieselskapet Bonheur v. San Francisco & P. S. S. Co. 287 F. 679, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Rogers v. Brix Bros. Logging Co. 287 F. 867, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Presidio Mining Co. v. Overton 286 F. 848, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Marine Hardware Co. v. Halfhill Packing Corp. 286 F. 913, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Bilboa v. United States 287 F. 125, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Kelso State Bank 287 F. 828, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Conrad v. California & M. S. S. Co. 287 F. 873, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Spreckels v. Wakefield 286 F. 465, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Czizek 286 F. 478, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Crossett-Western Lumber Co. v. Sudden & Christenson 286 F. 482, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Meischke-Smith v. Wardell 286 F. 785, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Petersen v. United States 287 F. 17, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Klepper v. Carter 286 F. 370, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Blake 285 F. 1022, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Doan v. Dyer 286 F. 339, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Hotchner v. Federal Electric Co. 286 F. 487, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • McDowell v. United States 286 F. 521, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • D'Aleria v. Shirey 286 F. 523, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Lam Fook You v. White 286 F. 529, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Mathews v. Butte Machinery Co. 286 F. 801, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • A. Magnus Sons Co. v. Orey 287 F. 1, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Keller v. Adams-Campbell Co. 287 F. 838, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Nichols v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. 286 F. 1, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Hughes v. United States Borax Co. 286 F. 24, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • State Bank v. Marincovich 286 F. 105, (9th Cir. 1923)
  • Baldini v. United States 286 F. 133, (9th Cir. 1923)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑