Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1929

Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Nepstad

Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Nepstad
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 17, 1929 · Wilbur
36 F.2d 947; 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2305 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Nepstad

Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is a companion ease to Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Melin (No. 5671) 36 F.(2d) 907, to which reference is hereby made for a more particular statement of the facts.

The court instructed the jury as to what constituted a commercial orchard substantially as in the ease of Sacramento, etc., v. Nelson (No. 5683) 36 F.(2d) 929, and in the case of Sacramento, etc., v. Haenggi (No. 5678) 36 F.(2d) 923, and therein held erroneous.

Judgment reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑