Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit /

1930

246 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit opinions from 1930.

  • Standard Acc. Ins. v. Tenney 41 F.2d 608, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Hayden v. United States 41 F.2d 614, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Mulivrana v. United States 41 F.2d 734, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Nagle v. Eizaguirre 41 F.2d 735, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • United States Fidelity &. Guaranty Co. v. Higgins 41 F.2d 739, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Kimbrel v. Territory of Hawaii 41 F.2d 740, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Nagle v. Mendoza 41 F.2d 745, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Nagle v. Quon Ming Him 42 F.2d 450, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Berntsen v. United States 41 F.2d 663, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Luama v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. 41 F.2d 358, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Weedin v. Yip Kim Wing 41 F.2d 665, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Commercial Credit Co. v. United States 41 F.2d 991, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Ingram v. Lehr 41 F.2d 169, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • George H. Lee Co. v. United States 41 F.2d 460, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Puget Sound Nav. Co. v. Nelson 41 F.2d 356, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Aplin v. United States 41 F.2d 495, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Finn v. George T. Mickle Lumber Co. of Oregon 41 F.2d 676, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • States S. S. Co. v. Berglann 41 F.2d 456, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Brewster-Greene v. Scott 41 F.2d 165, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Custer v. McCutcheon 41 F.2d 354, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Bettis v. California Mfg. & Engineering Co. 41 F.2d 458, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Nagle v. Wong Dock 41 F.2d 476, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Dong Tong Sing v. Nagle 41 F.2d 521, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Nagle v. Jin Suey 41 F.2d 522, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Cvitkovic v. United States 41 F.2d 682, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Bankers' Reserve Life Co. v. Yelland 41 F.2d 684, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Wilson v. Carr 41 F.2d 704, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Stephens v. United States 41 F.2d 440, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Smith v. United States 41 F.2d 215, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Thomas Day Co. v. Doble Laboratories 41 F.2d 51, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Laurence A. Sweet Mfg. Co. v. Miller & Pardee, Inc. 41 F.2d 220, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Townsend v. Lorraine Corp. 41 F.2d 361, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Ley Gay Seong v. Carr 41 F.2d 362, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Beard v. United States 41 F.2d 711, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • American-Hawaiian S. S. Co. v. Pacific S. S. Co. 41 F.2d 718, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Cove Irr. Dist. v. American Surety Co. of New York 42 F.2d 957, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Buena Vista Land & Development Co. v. Lucas 41 F.2d 131, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Matheson v. National Surety Co. 41 F.2d 155, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Armstrong v. United States 41 F.2d 162, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. A. G. Col Co. 41 F.2d 121, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Alford v. United States 41 F.2d 157, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Maryland Casualty Co. v. Klickalumber Co. 41 F.2d 222, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Elford v. Smith Transp. Co. 41 F.2d 223, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Kral 41 F.2d 508, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Handler 41 F.2d 511, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Weber 41 F.2d 514, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Burch v. United States 41 F.2d 709, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Seaboard Dairy Credit Corp. v. Erickson 41 F.2d 726, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Kennedy v. United States 44 F.2d 131, (9th Cir. 1930)
  • Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Tatham 40 F.2d 894, (9th Cir. 1930)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑