U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1933

Haas Baruch & Co. v. Casey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 27, 1933 · Sawtelle, Sure, Wilbur

62 F.2d 1047; 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 3921 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Craig & Weller and Thomas S. Tobin, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners., Hiram E. Casey, of Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Schepp v. Producers, Inc. (7th Cir. 1961)
Tetzke v. Trust No. 2988 of Foreman Trust & Sav. Bank (7th Cir. 1936)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

The application of creditors whose claims have been disallowed to appeal from the order of the District Court affirming the order of the referee appointing E. W. Bailly as the duly elected trustee in bankruptcy, based upon the claims that the referee erred in disallowing the appellants’ claims and in allowing the claims of the creditors whose votes elected the trustee, will not be allowed. The orders of the District Court allowing or rejecting claims are appealable under 11 USCA § 48. The court could not properly review these matters upon an appeal from an order approving the appointment of a trustee, where such approval is based upon his election by a majority of the creditors whose claims had been allowed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.