U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1935

California Canning Peach Growers v. Myers

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 3, 1935

78 F.2d 194; 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 3675 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

D. Hadsell, Joe G. Sweet, and Everett A. Ingalls, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Harold M. Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., H. H. McPike, U. S. Atty., and Dorothy Manners Williams, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., Carl McFarland and A. H. Feller, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and Seth Thomas, Sol., Department of Agriculture, and Arthur C. Bachrach, John J. Abt, and Donald B. MacGuineas, Attys., Agricultural Adjustment Administration, all of Washington, D. G, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Brill v. General Industrial Enterprises (3d Cir. 1956)
Brill v. General Industrial Enterprises, Inc. (3d Cir. 1956)
Fleming v. Sebastiani (9th Cir. 1947)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a bill in equity praying for an injunction to enjoin defendants from conducting a hearing under the Agricultural Adjustment Code on an order to show cause why the license issued by the Secretary of Agriculture to the plaintiff should not be revoked. A motion to dismiss the bill was granted, from which the plaintiff appeals.

*195Since the prosecution of this appeal, the hearing sought to be enjoined has concluded. The appellees moved to dismiss the appeal because the cause is moot.

The questions arising upon this appeal have become moot. Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U. S. 487, 31 S. Ct. 43, 54 L. Ed. 1121; Mills v. Green, 159 U. S. 651, 16 S. Ct. 132, 40 L. Ed. 293; Jones v. Montague, 194 U. S. 147, 24 S. Ct. 611, 48 L. Ed. 913; Selden v. Montague, 194 U. S. 153, 24 S. Ct. 613, 48 L. Ed. 915; Wingert v. First National Bank, 223 U. S. 670, 32 S. Ct. 391, 56 L. Ed. 605.

The appeal is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.