U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1938

Moore Dry Dock Co. v. Pillsbury

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 7, 1938 · Garrecht, Haney, Mathews

98 F.2d 115; 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 3166 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Emmet Cashin and Harold M. Sawyer, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., and S. P. Murman, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Pillsbury.

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision. The 5 that cite it most often are listed here.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Okin (2d Cir. 1943)
Hilao v. Estate of Marcos (9th Cir. 1996)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mount Vernon Memorial Park (9th Cir. 1982)
16 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1295, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,732 United States of America v. City of Chicago (7th Cir. 1976)
Russell E. Peterson v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, Grand International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (7th Cir. 1959)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order refusing an application for an interlocutory injunction. The order was entered on June 10, 1937. This appeal was taken on June 25, 1937. Thereafter the case proceeded to final hearing, and on November 22, 1937, the District Court entered a final decree dismissing the bill of complaint. An appeal from the final decree was taken on February 1, 1938, and is now pending in this court. Hence, the first. mentioned appeal should be dismissed. Sterling v. Constantin, 287 U.S. 378, 386, 53 S.Ct. 190, 191, 77 L.Ed. 375; Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission, 286 U.S. 210, 224, 52 S.Ct. 559, 561, 76 L.Ed. 1062, 86 A.L.R. 403; Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kuykendall, 265 U.S. 196, 205, 44 S.Ct. 553, 556, 68 L.Ed. 975; Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S. 37, 44, 40 S.Ct. 221, 222, 64 L.Ed. 445.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.