U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1942

Anthony v. National Labor Relations Board

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 31, 1942 · Denman, Mathews, Stephens

132 F.2d 620; 11 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 787; 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2650 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Guy Anthony, of Los Angeles, Cal., in propria persona., No other appearances were entered.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Elmer E. Kovach v. National Labor Relations Board (7th Cir. 1956)
Albrecht v. National Labor Relations Board (Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corporation, Intervenor) (7th Cir. 1950)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks our order permitting him to file and prosecute in forma pauperis a petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, which petitioner alleges “deprives him of re-employment and back wages due.” The National Labor Relations Act gives this court no jurisdiction of such a controversy. To invoke our jurisdiction under § 10 of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160, the petitioner must be a “person aggrieved” by the order. A workman has no personal claim for back pay or reinstatement in employment en-forcible in this court. Hence he is not a “person aggrieved” within the meaning of that Act. National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 309 U.S. 350, 363, 60 S.Ct. 569, 84 L.Ed. 799; National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash & Chemical Corp., 9 Cir., 113 F.2d 232, 235, 129 A.L.R. 874; National Labor Relations Board v. Sunshine Mining Co., 9 Cir., 125 F.2d 757, 761.

The petition is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.