U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1944

Haley v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 26, 1944 · Garrecht, Matliews

145 F.2d 235; 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2458 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

John W. Mahan and C E. Pew, both of Helena, Mont., for appellant., Lester P. Schoene, Director, Bureau of War Risk Litigation, of Washington, I). C., Francis M. Shea, Asst. U. S. Atty. Gen., Wilbur C. Pickett and Fendall Marbury, Attys., Dept, of Justice, both of Washington, D. C., John B. Tansil, U. S. Atty., of Billings, Mont., and Francis J. McGan, Sp. Atty., Department of Justice, of Butte, Mont., for appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties from which it appears that a compromise has been *236agreed upon and accepted on behalf of the appellee by direction of the Attorney General, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court in this cause, 46 F.Supp. 4, be and hereby is vacated, and that this cause be and hereby is remanded to the District Court for entry of a new judgment upon the compromise agreement pursuant t-o the provisions of c. 101, 48 Stat. 302, as amended by c. 34, 52 Stat. 81, 38 U.S.C. § 445b.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.