U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1945

United States v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co.

United States v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 1, 1945 · Denman, Garrecht, Healy
151 F.2d 61 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Charles H. Carr, U. S. Atty., Ronald Walker, and W. W. Worthington, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., Alvin M. Loverud, Atty., Fed. Security Agency, of Washington, D. C. (Vincent A. Kleinfeld and John T. Grigsby, Attys., Department of Justice, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant., Norman A. Eisner, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

United States v. Washington Dehydrated Food Co.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This appeal coming on to be heard, and it appearing that the appellee consents to the granting of the prayers of the libel that the 10 sacks of apple chops remaining in the jurisdiction of the court be destroyed because of their becoming rotten and valueless while in the possession of the court, and hence it appearing that the question of the assigned errors upon which the appellant relies for a reversal have become moot; now, therefore, without consideration of any of such claimed errors, but pursuant to said consent, the decree appealed from is reversed without costs to either party, and the District Court ordered to enter a decree ordering the destruction, of the said sacks of apple chops.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.