U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1946

Commissioner v. Howard C. Platt Trust

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 16, 1946

154 F.2d 1016; 34 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1171; 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 3416 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Sewall Key, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, B. I. R., of Washington, D. C., for petitioner., Oscar Samuels and Tevis Jacobs, both of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent Howard C. Platt Trust., Marshall P. Madison, Sigvald Nielson, and Harry R. Harrow, all of San Francisco, Cal., for respondents Estate of E. B. F. Tibbits and Elizabeth Moffitt Folger Trust., Howard J. Finn, Theodore R. Meyer, and Robert H. Walker, all of San Francisco, Cal., for respondents J. A. Folger, Peter Folger, John M. & Edith P. Cunningham Trust, Estate of C. E. L. Folger, deceased, and Gladys Platt Pendleton., Walter C. Fox, Jr., of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent Evelyn C. Donohoe and Genevieve C. Kent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Godley's Estate (3d Cir. 1954)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulations of counsel for respective parties, filed in each of above causes, for dismissal of the petition for review in each cause, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the petition for review in each of above causes be dismissed, that a judgment be filed in each cause and recorded in the minutes of this Court accordingly, and that the mandate of this Court in each cause issue forthwith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.