U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1946

Standish v. Commissioner

Standish v. Commissioner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 26, 1946
154 F.2d 1022 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

R. Clarence Ogden, of San Francisco, Cal., for petitioners., Sewall Key, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Division, and J. Louis Monarch and John F. Costelloe, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

Standish v. Commissioner

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties that the decisions of the Tax Court of the United States, 4 T.C. 995, in above cause may be affirmed, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the decisions of the Tax Court of the United States in the above causes be affirmed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.