Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1947

Brooks Clothing of California v. Brooks Brothers

Brooks Clothing of California v. Brooks Brothers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 9, 1947 · Garrecht, Mathews, and Healy, Circuit Judges
158 F.2d 798 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Brooks Clothing of California v. Brooks Brothers

Opinion

158 F.2d 798 (1947)

BROOKS CLOTHING OF CALIFORNIA, Limited, Defendant-Appellant,
v.
BROOKS BROTHERS, Plaintiff-Appellee.

No. 11158.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 9, 1947.
Rehearing Denied February 10, 1947.

Pacht, Pelton, Warne, Ross & Bernhard, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Isaac Pacht, Clore Warne, and Bernard Reich, all of Los Angeles, Cal., and Harry D. Nims, Minturn de S. Verdi, and Wm. Mitchell Van Winkle, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Beekman Aitken, of New York City (Felix T. Smith, Eugene Prince, and Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, all of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of District Judge Leon R. Yankwich (60 F.Supp. 442) correctly sets forth the salient facts, analyzes the issues, and applies the law. We adopt that opinion as our own. The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑