U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1947

Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd. v. Brooks Bros.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 9, 1947

158 F.2d 798; 72 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 66; 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2401 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Pacht, Pelton, Warne, Ross & Bernhard, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Isaac Pacht, Clore Warne, and Bernard Reich, all of Los An-geles, Cal., and Harry D. Nims, Minturn de S. Verdi, and Wm. Mitchell Van Winkle, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant., Beekman Aitken, of New York City (Felix T. Smith, Eugene Prince, and Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, all of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Pizzeria Uno Corp. v. Temple (District Court, D. South Carolina 1983)
Coit Drapery Cleaners, Inc. v. Coit Drapery Cleaners of New York, Inc. (District Court, E.D. New York 1976)
Brooks Clothing of California v. Brooks Brothers (9th Cir. 1947)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of District Judge Leon R. Yankwich (60 F.Supp. 442) correctly sets forth the salient facts, analyzes the issues, and applies the law. We adopt that opinion as our own. The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.