U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1948

Long v. Davis

Long v. Davis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 21, 1948
169 F.2d 982; 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2291 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Hunter & Liljestrom, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant., Milton V. Backman, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for appellees.

Long v. Davis

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a motion granting a new trial. The appeal was taken on July 9, 1948. Appellees moved to dismiss it on the ground that the order was not a final decision, within the meaning of § 128(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 225(a),1 1946 Edition, then in effect, and hence was not appealable. The motion is well founded. Sentinel v. Dinwiddie, 7 Cir., 41 F.2d 57; Hunt v. United States, 10 Cir., 53 F.2d 333; East Erie Commercial Co. v. Denial, 3 Cir., 66 F.2d 555; Frank Mercantile Corp. v. Prudential Ins. Co., 3 Cir., 115 F.2d 496. Accordingly, it is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Now 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.