U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1950

Frances Leon Parrish v. Acacia Mutual Life Insurance Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 15, 1950 · Mathews, Stephens, Orr

184 F.2d 185 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Russell H. Pray and Eric A. Rose, Long Beach, Cal., for appellant., Adams, Duque, Davis & Hazeltine, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Henry Duque, Lawrence T. Lydick and A. Andrew Hauk, all of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Cohen v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance (Cal. 1957)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM. '

Appellant sought judgment in the District Court for the sum of $10,000 as beneficiary under a policy of insurance issued by appellee to her husband. After trial by jury a verdict was rendered in favor of appellant.

On motion of appellee the trial court granted judgment in its favor notwithstanding the verdict.

In granting the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict the court filed a written opinion in which it set out at length and in detail the reasoning upon which it based its judgment.

We think the trial court reached the correct conclusion and we adopt the reasoning expressed in its opinion, D4C., 92 F. Supp. 300.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.