U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1950

Newman v. State of California

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 9, 1950 · Stephens, Orr, McLaugitlin

185 F.2d 392; 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3283 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Emil Newman, in pro. per., Dion R. Holm, City Atty., Thomas M. O’Connor, Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees City & County of San Francisco and Elmer E. Robinson., Fred N. Howser, Atty. Gen. State of Cal., Clarence A. Linn, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellees State of Cal., Fred N. Howser and J. Hession.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. State of Arizona (9th Cir. 1953)
Newman v. State of California (9th Cir. 1950)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Heretofore this court dismissed the appeal in the above entitled case upon the ground that no judgment had ever been entered in the case by a court. Thereafter *393 we denied a petition for rehearing. We now have before us another petition for a rehearing with no change in the record. Petitioner is a layman acting for himself and seems not to understand that there must be a judgment, and not merely a statement that a judgment will be made and entered, before we can entertain an appeal. If and when a judgment is entered and an appeal is properly taken we shall of course entertain and decide the appeal.

Cause was ordered dismissed August 22, 1950.

Rehearing was denied October 2, 1950.

Rehearing denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.