United States v. Frank Wallace and R. M. Makemson, Doing Business as Wallace and Wallace, a Partnership

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 20, 1950

United States v. Frank Wallace and R. M. Makemson, Doing Business as Wallace and Wallace, a Partnership, 185 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1950)

Opinion

185 F.2d 676

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
Frank WALLACE and R. M. Makemson, doing business as Wallace
and Wallace, a partnership, Appellees.

No. 12529.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 20, 1950.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Dave W. Ling, Judge.

H. G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frank E. Flynn, U.S. Atty., E. R. Thurman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., George A. Fruit, Attorney, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., (Joseph M. Friedman, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., J. Gregory Bruce and John G. Roberts, Attorneys, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., of counsel) for appellant.

Evans, Hull, Kitchel & Jenckes and Norman S. Hull, all of Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS and HEALY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court affirmed. See United States v. Pacific Fruit and Produce Co., 9 Cir., 1943, 138 F.2d 367, cf. Bolten v. General Motors Corp., 7 Cir., 1950, 180 F.2d 379.

Reference

Status: Published