U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1951

Lowden v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 20, 1951 · Denman, Pope, Goodman

187 F.2d 484; 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2266 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Leroy L. Lomax, Portland, Or., for appellant., Henry L. Hess, U. S. Atty., Floyd D. Hamilton and John R. Brooke, Asst. U. S. Attys.', Portland, Or., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Cohen v. United States (9th Cir. 1953)
Ex Parte Cohen (9th Cir. 1951)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment on the first count of the indictment is affirmed, the instrument proved falsely to have been made by the appellant being an order for the purpose of enabling a person to obtain from an officer of the United States the sum of $592.00 in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 495.

It is unnecessary to consider the contention of error in the judgment on the second count of the indictment, since it is for the same term of imprisonment and to run concurrently with the first count. Danziger v. United States, 9 Cir., 161 F.2d 299, 301.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.