U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1951

Young v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 28, 1951 · Fee, Healy, Per Curiam, Pope

190 F.2d 558; 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2460 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Tom B. Markley, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., J. Charles Dennis, U. S. Atty., Vaughn Evans, John F. Dore and Kenneth J. Selander, Assts., all of Seattle, Wash., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

George Edward Duggins v. United States (6th Cir. 1957)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The brief of Young, signed by him, is stricken because of scandalous personal attacks, squarely contradicted by the record which is on file.

For many reasons, this appeal must be dismissed. The most obvious of these are that (1) there was no order entered from which appeal could be taken, and that (2) if the opinion of the Judge denying be accepted as the order, which it should not be, the appeal was not in time. We do not consider the proceeding premature, but have thoroughly examined the record and the points made and find the sentence and judgment are not void for the reasons alleged or for any reason.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.