U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1951

Charles v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 23, 1951 · Healy, Mathews, Orr, Per Curiam

190 F.2d 887; 40 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1185; 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2510; 40 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1185 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

E. J. Botts, Honolulu, T. H., Wayne M. Collins, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Howard K. Hoddick, Acting U. S. Atty., Nat Richardson, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Honolulu, T. H., Chauncey Tramutolo, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, llene Charles, alias Arlene Charles, was charged by information with having violated 26 U.S.C.A. § 2550(a). She waived jury trial, was tried by the court without a jury and was found guilty. From a judgment sentencing her to pay a fine of $2500 and to be imprisoned for a year and a day she has appealed. The only question presented is whether the evidence warranted the finding of guilt. It did. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.