Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- S. P. Beecher v. Homer Smithson, Trustee (9th Cir. 1954)
- Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank (9th Cir. 1953)
- Monetary II Limited Partnership, J. Thomas Hannan, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service (9th Cir. 1995)
- Kelsey D. Bartlett v. Dr. Joseph Duty (6th Cir. 1959)
- Matter of the Application of Clayton C. Pierce, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (9th Cir. 1957)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Beecher alleges that he has filed in the district court certain notices of appeal which he describes as follows: Notice of Appeal June 5, 1951; Notice of Appeal June 13, 1951; Notice of Appeal June 30, 1951; Notice of Appeal August 4, 1951.
He seeks our order to permit him to appeal forma pauperis. His affidavit fails to describe the error he claims in any one of the orders appealed from. That is to say, he does not state the nature of the appeal, the merits of which we are required to consider before granting him the right to appeal in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Huffman v. Smith, 9 Cir., 172 F.2d 129; cf. Fisher v. Cushman, 9 Cir., 99 F.2d 918.
The permission to appeal forma pauperis in these' appeals is dénied. • This order is without prejudice to the filing of a proper affidavit. Appellant’s time to docket the records in any above appeals hereafter taken in forma pauperis is extended to October 15, 1951.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.