U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1951

Roach v. Matanuska Valley Farmer's Cooperating Ass'n

Roach v. Matanuska Valley Farmer's Cooperating Ass'n
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 16, 1951 · Healy, Lem, Mon, Orr
13 Alaska 290; 188 F.2d 162

Counsel

Bailey E. Bell, Anchorage, Alaska, for appellant., Davis & Renfrew, Anchorage, Alaska, for appellee.

Roach v. Matanuska Valley Farmer's Cooperating Ass'n

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of District Judge Dimond, reported in 87 F.Supp. 641, 12 Alaska 512.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.