Stack v. United States
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Spector (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1951)
- De Veau v. United States (D.C. 1982)
- Yates v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1958)
- Harkins v. Lauf (Mo. 1976)
- United States v. Bert Croft, Jr. (6th Cir. 1971)
- Spector v. United States (9th Cir. 1952)
- Stack v. United States (9th Cir. 1951)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion, United States v. Schneiderman, D.C.S.D.Cal., 102 F.Supp. 52, the District Court’s order should be affirmed.
Opinion of the Court
The order denying the motion of appellants to reduce the bail of $50,000.00 is reversed. The case is remanded and the district court ordered to enter orders as follows :
For each of the appealing defendants
Loretta Starvus Stack
William Schneiderman
Albert Jason Lima
Carl Rude Lambert
Oleta O’Connor Yates
Henry Steinberg
Mary Bernadette Doyle
an order that he or she be released from confinement upon the posting of bail in the sum of $10,000.00 cash or bond conditioned as required by law, to be approved by the District Court for the Southern District of California and filed with the Clerk of that court.
For each of the following appealing defendants
Al Richmond
Philip Marshall Connelly
Dorothy Rosenblum Healey
Rose Chernin Kusnitz
Ernest Otto Fox
an order that he or she be released from confinement upon the posting of bail in the sum of $5,000.00 cash or bond conditioned as required by law, to be approved by the district court for the Southern District of California and filed with the Clerk of that court.
WILLIAM DENMAN Chief Judge
ALBERT LEE STEPHENS Circuit Judge
WILLIAM HEALY Circuit Judge
WALTER L. POPE Circuit Judge
Concurring in Part
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
We concur in the order of this court reversing the order of the District Court denying the motion to' reduce bail theretofore fixed in the sum of $50,000.
We dissent from the order of this court fixing bail of certain of the appealing defendants at $10,000 and of other appealing defendants in the sum of $5,000, for the reason that we deem, said amounts to be inadequate.
HOMER T. BONE WM. E. ORR United States Circuit Judges.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.