U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1953

Bickford v. United States

Bickford v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 19, 1953 · Denman, Healy, Bone
206 F.2d 395; 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 2760 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Norvell Milbern Bickford, appellant, in propria persona., Edward W. Scruggs, U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., Oliver T. Hamilton, Asst. U. S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.

Bickford v. United States

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM..

Bickford appeals from a judgment, D.C., 109 F.Supp. 154, denying him relief on his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which he filed on February 6, 1953. This is his third motion on substantially the same grounds.

Section 2255 provides: “The sentencing court shall not be required to entertain a second or successive motion for similar relief on behalf of the same prisoner.”

The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.