U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1953

Steinberg v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided November 5, 1953 · Denman, Healy, Per Curiam, Pope

207 F.2d 772 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Richard Gladstein, of Gladstein, Andersen & Leonard, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Lloyd H. Burke, U. S. Atty., Robert EL Schnaeke, Asst. U. S. Atty., Richard EL Foster, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Piper (District Court, N.D. Texas 1964)
United States v. Stein (District Court, S.D. New York 1955)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that there was evidence before the district court that Steinberg is a person likely to attempt to leave the jurisdiction of the district court, we find there was no abuse of discretion in fixing his bail at $35,000.00.

The order appealed from, 114 F.Supp. 899, is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.