U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1955

Northwest Marine Terminals Association v. Federal Maritime Board and United States of America, Intercoastal Steamship Freight Association, Intervening

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 17, 1955 · Denman, Healy, Per Curiam, Pope

218 F.2d 815; 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2843; 1955 A.M.C. 293 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Bogle, Bogle, & Gates, Edward G. Dobrin, Robert W. Graham,. Seattle, Wash., Thomas J. White, Norman E. Sutherland, White, Sutherland & Parks, Portland, Or., for appellants., Stanley N. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daniel M. Friedman, Spe. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Clarence G. Morse, Gen. Counsel, Max E. Halpern, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Edward Aptaker, Atty. Federal Maritime Board, Washington, D. C., for appellee., Wood, Matthiessen, Wood & Tatum, Erskine B. Wood, Portland, Or., for intervenor.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Samuel B. Franklin & Company v. Securities and Exchange Commission (9th Cir. 1961)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner filed a petition to review a final order of the Federal Maritime Board which was entered more than 60 days before review was sought. It contends that inasmuch as it filed a motion with the Board for reconsideration, its 60 days runs from the entry of the order denying reconsideration. We disposed of this contention adversely to petitioner in' Consolidated Flower Shipments, Inc., v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 449.

The 60 days commences when the Board’s final order is handed down and a subsequent petition for rehearing or reconsideration does not extend that time.

The motion to dismiss the petition is granted:

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.