Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1956

Eugene F. Evarts, Monrova S. Evarts, and Eugene K. Evarts v. C. J. Jones, C. S. Jones, Jones Brothers, C. J. Jones & Associates

Eugene F. Evarts, Monrova S. Evarts, and Eugene K. Evarts v. C. J. Jones, C. S. Jones, Jones Brothers, C. J. Jones & Associates
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 23, 1956
228 F.2d 105 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Eugene F. Evarts, Monrova S. Evarts, and Eugene K. Evarts v. C. J. Jones, C. S. Jones, Jones Brothers, C. J. Jones & Associates

Opinion

228 F.2d 105

Eugene F. EVARTS, Monrova S. Evarts, and Eugene K. Evarts, Appellants,
v.
C. J. JONES, C. S. Jones, Jones Brothers, C. J. Jones &
Associates, et al., Appellees.

No. 14761.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 9, 1955.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 23, 1956.

Elon G. Galusha, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

Clock, Waestman & Clock, Long Beach, Cal., for appellees.

Before HEALY, BONE, and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case is here on a judgment of dismissal of appellants' complaint for want of jurisdiction.

2

The complaint shows affirmatively that all parties, both plaintiff and defendant, are citizens and residents of the State of California. The suit has to do only with a controversy arising out of the construction of a conditional sales contract, presenting no federal question.

3

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑