U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1956

Albert A. Arvidson v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation, W. J. Whiteaker v. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 17, 1956 · Bone, Orr, Murphy

236 F.2d 224 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Schafer, Cronan & Nelson, James P. Cronan, Jr., Portland, Ore., Paul M. Reeder, Hillsboro, Ore., Eisenhower, Hunter, Ramsdell & Duncan, Tacoma, Wash., for appellants., King, Miller, Anderson, Nash & Yerke, Frederic A. Yerke, Jr., Portland, Ore., Henderson, Carnahan, Thompson & Gordon, Tacoma, Wash., Walter L. Rice, W. Tobin Lennon, Richmond, Virginia, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision. The 3 that cite it most often are listed here.

Laurie Freeman, Sharon Mockmore, Beccy Boysel, Gary D. Boysel, Linda L. Goreham, Gary R. Goreham, Kelcey Brackett, and Bobbie Lynn Weatherman v. Grain Processing Corporation (Iowa 2014)
Stockdale v. Agrico Chemical Co., Div. of Con. Oil Co. (District Court, N.D. Iowa 1972)
Ellison v. Rayonier Incorporated (District Court, W.D. Washington 1957)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cases coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the findings of fact of the district court were not clearly erroneous, and that the judgments are sustained by substantial evidence, and that the conclusions of law of the district court were correctly drawn,

The judgment is affirmed, upon the opinion of the district court in W.D. Wash.1954, 125 F.Supp. 481;

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.